<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leadership Communication: From Ideas to Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lundbergmedia.com/2009/05/26/leadership-communication-from-ideas-to-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lundbergmedia.com/2009/05/26/leadership-communication-from-ideas-to-action/</link>
	<description>business technology analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: abbielundberg</title>
		<link>http://lundbergmedia.com/2009/05/26/leadership-communication-from-ideas-to-action/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abbielundberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lundbergmedia.com/?p=179#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting distinction to make. In general I&#039;d probably put &quot;what&quot; and &quot;how&quot; together, but I agree when it comes to IT, the &quot;how&quot; is much more likely to be left to IT alone, while everyone should take part in the &quot;what&quot; discussion. Thanks for the note!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting distinction to make. In general I&#8217;d probably put &#8220;what&#8221; and &#8220;how&#8221; together, but I agree when it comes to IT, the &#8220;how&#8221; is much more likely to be left to IT alone, while everyone should take part in the &#8220;what&#8221; discussion. Thanks for the note!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbcurran</title>
		<link>http://lundbergmedia.com/2009/05/26/leadership-communication-from-ideas-to-action/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cbcurran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lundbergmedia.com/?p=179#comment-56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the drums that I&#039;ve been beating lately is understanding the audience and style of communication needed; ie &quot;boardroom or ballroom.&quot;  In other words, is the communication a small group discussion or more of an informative broadcast?  I think that CIOs who have come up through the IT organization have deep knowledge on the &quot;how&quot; things are done, process, project plans, Gantt charts, etc.  &quot;How&quot; discussions tend to drive one-way, detailed, busy discussions and slideware. One the other hand, &quot;why&quot; and &quot;what&quot; conversations are more about asking questions and having rich discussions.  The resulting slides are more outlines, if they are even needed at all.  Personally I have worked to become more what/why oriented and advise CIOs to do the same.

Thanks Abbie for a great and much needed topic.

-Chris
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ciodashboard.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CIO Dashboard&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the drums that I&#8217;ve been beating lately is understanding the audience and style of communication needed; ie &#8220;boardroom or ballroom.&#8221;  In other words, is the communication a small group discussion or more of an informative broadcast?  I think that CIOs who have come up through the IT organization have deep knowledge on the &#8220;how&#8221; things are done, process, project plans, Gantt charts, etc.  &#8220;How&#8221; discussions tend to drive one-way, detailed, busy discussions and slideware. One the other hand, &#8220;why&#8221; and &#8220;what&#8221; conversations are more about asking questions and having rich discussions.  The resulting slides are more outlines, if they are even needed at all.  Personally I have worked to become more what/why oriented and advise CIOs to do the same.</p>
<p>Thanks Abbie for a great and much needed topic.</p>
<p>-Chris<br />
<a href="http://www.ciodashboard.com/" rel="nofollow">CIO Dashboard</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

